home: libraries of information

Library for Citizens

Information assembled for concerned citizens.

Bookmarks on this page

Overview
Coal Gasification and IGCC Technologies Explained
Coal Gasification Is Ready for Widespread Deployment
A Technology With Many Environmental Advantages
A Good Choice for a Secure Energy Future
More Information

Overview

America and other nations stand at a critical energy juncture. With limited supplies of natural gas (and skyrocketing prices), we can no longer rely so heavily on gas to meet growing demands for electricity. In the future we may get most of our electricity from solar, wind, or other renewable sources. Until then, we need alternatives that are cost efficient and environmentally sound. IGCC power is one such alternative.

Coal Gasification and IGCC Technologies Explained

Coal gasification is a process that converts coal from a solid to a gaseous state; it's a process that has been known and refined for more than 100 years.
IGCC is a technology that generates electricity from the synthetic gas produced from the gasification of coal or other hydrocarbons. There are many succinct documents explaining both coal gasification and IGCC, including:
How Coal Gasification Powerplants Work, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, October 13, 2004.  Page Link
What Is Gasification?, Gasification Technologies Council.  Page Link
Fundamentals of Gasification, Ross Fava (Shell Global Solutions), Gasification Technologies Workshop, June 8, 2004 (21 pages).  Summary

Coal Gasification Is Ready for Widespread Deployment

There are no technical or economic reasons why coal gasification cannot be readily deployed by the electric power industry. Coal gasification has been used to produce liquid fuels in South Africa for 50 years and chemicals here in the United States for more than 20 years. In addition, four demonstration-scale (i.e. 250 MWe) coal-based IGCC powerplants (two in the United States and two in Europe) have been successfully operating since the 1990s. Finally, large commercial-scale (500-1,000 MWe) IGCC powerplants using petroleum refinery residues are online or under development in the United States, Italy, Japan, China, and many other countries. See, for example:

Industry In Transition - The 2004 World Gasification Survey, James Childress (Gasification Technologies Council), 2004 Gasification Technology Conference, October 3, 2004 (15 pages).  Summary

IGCC - The Stars Are Aligned, Roger Goodman (Cambridge Energy Research Associates), 2004 Gasification Technology Conference, October 3, 2004 (7 pages).  Summary
Coal Gasification: Ready for Prime Time, Bill Trapp, Nate Moock, and David Denton (all Eastman Gasification Services), Power Magazine, March 2004.  Page Link
Pioneering Gasification Plants, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, November 9, 2004.  Page Link
A Technology With Many Environmental Advantages
IGCC plants produce significantly lower levels of criteria air pollutants, use less water, generate fewer solid wastes, and consume less coal compared to other coal-based powerplants. In addition -- as Eastman Chemical Company has proven at its Tennessee facility -- gasification is readily amenable to cost-effective mercury remediation. Finally, IGCC provides a much more economically efficient pathway for the removal and storage of carbon dioxide should such capture and sequestration be required in the United States eventually. These documents are recommended on these subjects:

Major Environmental Aspects of Gasification-Based Power Generation Technologies, Jay Ratafia-Brown, Lynn Manfredo, Jeff Hoffman, and Massood Ramezan (all Science Applications International Corp.), 2002, (270 pages).  Summary

The BACT Analysis: Does IGCC Meet the Test?, John Thompson (Clean Air Task Force), Gasification Technologies Workshop, June 8, 2004 (11 pages).  Summary

Cost of Mercury Removal from Coal-Based IGCC Relative to a PC Plant, Michael Rutkowski, M. Klett, and R. Maxwell (all Parsons Infrastructure and Technology Group, Inc.), 2002 Gasification Technology Conference, October 28, 2002 (26 pages).  Summary

Summary of Recent IGCC Studies of CO2 Capture for Sequestration, Neville Holt and George Booras (EPRI), Douglas Todd (Process Power Plants), 2003 Gasification Technology Conference, October 12, 2003 (9 pages).  Summary

A Good Choice for a Secure Energy Future
Many natural gas experts believe that gas production in the United States (outside Alaska) is at or near maximum capacity. Whether true or not, it is clear that known U.S. reserves of natural gas -- ?? years by EIA estimates -- are far less than the 250+ years of known U.S. coal reserves. While imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) are expected to grown dramatically in future decades, many people believe that relying on gas imports to meet America's growing demand for electricity is not as wise as using coal gasification to produce synthetic natural gas. The following document provides a good discussion of these topics.

Coal and Wind: Thoughts on the Future of Generation in a High-Priced and Volatile Natural Gas Market, Charles Linderman (Edison Electric Institute), National Energy Modeling System/Annual Energy Outlook 2004, March 23, 2004 (23 pages).  Summary

More Information
The clean-energy.us information database includes a wide range of topics that may be of interest to individual citizens interested in U.S. energy policy:
Technology Explanations - Gasification of Coal and Other Hydrocarbons
Technology Explanations - Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)
IGCC vs. Other Power Generation Technologies
Development Trends - North America
General Environmental Assessments
Emissions and Residues - Criteria Air Pollutants
Emissions and Residues - Airborne Mercury
Projects in Commercial Operation - Eastman
Projects in Commercial Operation - Polk
Projects in Commercial Operation - Wabash River
Projects in Commercial Operation - Great Plains
Additional topics
top of page
 

  © 2004-2009 Fred H. Hutchison

Edited on: March 27, 2009